Mise à jour de 'Home'
26
Home.md
26
Home.md
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ When the commercial success of Garaia proved to be too modest and I decided to c
|
|||||||
Since then I joined my dream company and became [Commercial Lead at Canonical
|
Since then I joined my dream company and became [Commercial Lead at Canonical
|
||||||
](https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandre-micouleau-03b7393/?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_feed%3Bl1sH%2Bt1gR7yuPj1uvN8vDQ%3D%3D). As such, not only did I join a company that promotes multi clouds and hybrid clouds, but a part of my job is also to prove the better economical and performance dominance of private clouds over public clouds.
|
](https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandre-micouleau-03b7393/?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_feed%3Bl1sH%2Bt1gR7yuPj1uvN8vDQ%3D%3D). As such, not only did I join a company that promotes multi clouds and hybrid clouds, but a part of my job is also to prove the better economical and performance dominance of private clouds over public clouds.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
And yet, it seemed a bit hypocritical of my part to keep most of my stacks on pulic clouds. Moreover, since I am now in charge of procuring servers for our infrastructure, I might as well acquire one of those for myself and have fun with it ! Well, most probably one of the great grand fathers of the kind we get at Canonical, but still ;-D ).
|
And yet, it seemed a bit hypocritical of my part to keep most of my stacks on public clouds. Moreover, since I am now in charge of procuring servers for our infrastructure, I might as well acquire one of those for myself and have fun with it ! Well, most probably one of the great grand fathers of the kind we get at Canonical, but still ;-D ).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
** Also, it might be fun to find that you can compete with public cloud prices even with modest/commodity hardware, since Canonical and its clients already do with larger infrastructure **
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So, that's the plan:
|
So, that's the plan:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -146,7 +148,7 @@ For instance, I read that HPE is only supporting their own brand of hard disks (
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
This config is promising as it looks like it fits both my needs and budget.
|
This config is promising as it looks like it fits both my needs and budget.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## specs comparison
|
## Specs comparison
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The config I am running for is clearly an overkill in terms of CPU :
|
The config I am running for is clearly an overkill in terms of CPU :
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -162,15 +164,23 @@ This config will provide:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Costs
|
## Costs Comparison
|
||||||
### Buying costs / CAPEX
|
### Buying costs / CapEx
|
||||||
In total for server, hard disks, and shipping : under than 250€
|
In total for server, hard disks, and shipping : under than 250€.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Running costs
|
I think I could run this setup as is for at least four years, given I replace 1 HDD/year on average.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* 250 / 4 = 62.5 € amortization / year
|
||||||
|
* 130 / 4 = 32.5 € replacement parts / year
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
** Yearly CapEx would amount to 95€/ year or 8€ / month **
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Running costs / OpEx
|
||||||
As the server will most probably be as idle as the existing setup, I envision it will consume around 180 to 200W.
|
As the server will most probably be as idle as the existing setup, I envision it will consume around 180 to 200W.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
At the current prices of energy in my area the yearly cost of energy would
|
At the current prices of energy in my area the yearly cost of energy would amount to around 35€ / year or 3 € /month
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Costs verdict
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**I would drop down from 36 € per month to 11.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user